Tennis bets today: One pick for Thursday ft. Cerundolo vs. Buse [8/27/2026]

Today’s tennis picks for August 27, 2026 are here, with Juan Cerundolo vs. Ignacio Buse among the top plays identified by our model across Thursday’s tennis schedule.

Dimers’ predictive analytics engine runs 24/7, going over the latest tennis odds to unearth real betting edges. The result? Data-backed picks that help Dimers Pro members make smarter decisions.

List of tennis picks today [8/27, updated 3:37PM ET]

Below, you’ll find today’s tennis best bets, ranked by edge for Thursday, August 27, 2026.

ATP Winston-Salem Open: Ignacio Buse ML (+112)

• Edge: 2.5%
• Probability: 49.7%
• Matchup: Juan Cerundolo vs. Ignacio Buse (4:00PM ET)

Our model has identified value on Ignacio Buse to defeat Juan Cerundolo at +112 odds in their matchup at ATP Winston-Salem Open. A 49.7% probability produces an edge of 2.5%, making this the strongest play for today's tennis slate.

Tennis best bets summary: Thursday, 8/27/2026

As of 3:37PM ET, here is our top tennis bet by edge recommended by our model:

List of upcoming tennis matches to bet on now

• ATP Winston Salem: Ignacio Buse vs. Juan Cerundolo (4:00PM ET, Thursday)
• WTA Monterrey: Ann Li vs. Alycia Parks (5:00PM ET, Thursday)
• WTA Monterrey: Nikola Bartunkova vs. Darja Vidmanova (6:10PM ET, Thursday)
• ATP Winston Salem: Aleksandar Kovacevic vs. Arthur Fery (6:30PM ET, Thursday)
• ATP Winston Salem: James Duckworth vs. Fabian Marozsan (7:40PM ET, Thursday)
• WTA Monterrey: Diane Parry vs. Clara Tauson (9:30PM ET, Thursday)
• WTA Monterrey: Elise Mertens vs. Yuliia Starodubtseva (10:40PM ET, Thursday)

Conclusion

Our tennis best bets are locked and loaded for August 27, 2026, featuring plays such as Ignacio Buse ML vs. Juan Cerundolo. Powered by advanced simulations, these picks are here to boost your betting game.

Our predictions are drawn from current data to help you make informed decisions. For additional resources and advice, head to our Responsible Gambling hub.

All odds and probabilities in this article are correct and accurate at the time of publication.